Tesla driving in Slovenia with the Slovenian flag in the background

Slovenia Awaiting EU Decision on Tesla FSD Supervised: No Automatic Recognition of Dutch Approval

The Slovenian Traffic Safety Agency (Agencija za varnost prometa (AVP)) has provided an official update on its position regarding Tesla FSD (Supervised). In a detailed response, the Agency's Vehicles Department confirms it is actively monitoring procedures and discussions at both the individual Member State and European Union levels.

Dutch Approval Has Only Temporary Validity

According to the AVP, the Dutch type-approval authority RDW has granted approval for the FSD (Supervised) system “with temporary or limited validity.” The Agency notes that RDW itself has emphasized this does not constitute a self-driving or autonomous vehicle, but rather an advanced driver assistance system in which the driver remains responsible for driving and must maintain control of the vehicle at all times.

This aligns with the Agency’s previous communications and reinforces that the Dutch decision does not automatically extend to Slovenia or other EU Member States.

EU-Level Coordination Required

The Slovenian response highlights that advanced driver assistance systems and new vehicle technologies fall under Regulation (EU) 2018/858 on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles.

Specifically, the procedure under Article 39 is designed for new technologies or novel concepts not yet fully covered by existing technical regulations. Such cases require:

  • A specific technical evaluation
  • The exchange of information between Member States and the European Commission
  • Coordination within the relevant European working bodies

The goal is to establish clear, comparable, and road-safety-appropriate conditions that apply uniformly or in a harmonized manner throughout the European Union.

“Regarding the possible wider deployment of the FSD (Supervised) system or comparable systems, we would therefore like to explain that further developments depend primarily on procedures and coordination at the EU level. Key factors will include the technical documentation, the conditions and limitations attached to any approvals, the findings of the competent type-approval authorities, and common European positions regarding the safe use of such systems in road traffic.”

Slovenian Traffic Safety Agency (AVP), Vehicles Department

Current Status and Outlook

The AVP states that until the relevant European procedures have been completed and/or harmonized conditions have been established, it is not possible to prejudge the final outcome.

The Agency will continue to monitor developments at both the EU and Member State levels and will act in accordance with applicable legislation, guided by the fundamental principle that the introduction of new technologies into road traffic must ensure a high level of safety for all road users.

Key Points from the Slovenian Traffic Safety Agency

  • FSD (Supervised) is classified as an advanced driver assistance system, not autonomous driving.
  • The driver must remain responsible and maintain control of the vehicle at all times.
  • The Dutch RDW approval has temporary or limited validity only.
  • Further progress depends on EU-level coordination under Regulation (EU) 2018/858 (Article 39).
  • The AVP is monitoring developments and will act to ensure high levels of road safety.

FAQ

Has Slovenia recognised the Dutch RDW approval for Tesla FSD Supervised?

No. According to the Slovenian Traffic Safety Agency (AVP), the Dutch type-approval has temporary or limited validity only. It does not constitute automatic validity of the system in all European Union member states. Recognition requires further EU-level coordination.

What is the Slovenian position on FSD Supervised?

The Agency emphasises that FSD Supervised is an advanced driver assistance system, not a self-driving or autonomous vehicle. The driver remains responsible for driving and must maintain control of the vehicle at all times. Further developments depend on procedures and coordination at the EU level under Regulation (EU) 2018/858.

What is the role of Article 39 in the Slovenian response?

Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 2018/858 covers derogations for new technologies or novel concepts. The Slovenian Agency notes that such procedures require specific technical evaluation, exchange of information between Member States and the European Commission, and coordination to establish harmonized, road-safety-appropriate conditions across the EU.

When might FSD Supervised become available in Slovenia?

The Agency states that until the relevant European procedures have been completed and/or harmonized conditions have been established, it is not possible to prejudge the final outcome. The AVP will continue to monitor developments at both the EU and Member State levels.

Keep reading

All articles →
Netherlands RDW Releases Detailed FSD Supervised Testing Data: 1.8 Million km of European Validation

Netherlands RDW Releases Detailed FSD Supervised Testing Data: 1.8 Million km of European Validation

The Dutch RDW has published a detailed explanation of its independent testing of Tesla FSD Supervised, including over 1.8 million km of European road data and more than 1,000 rigorous test runs.

UK Launches Consultation on Automated Vehicles Safety Principles: What It Means for Tesla FSD Supervised, Unsupervised and Robotaxi

UK Launches Consultation on Automated Vehicles Safety Principles: What It Means for Tesla FSD Supervised, Unsupervised and Robotaxi

The UK government has opened a public consultation on the statement of safety principles for self-driving vehicles. Here is how it could shape Tesla FSD Supervised for private owners and future commercial Robotaxi services.

Tesla Submits FSD Supervised Application to Taiwan's Vehicle Safety Certification Center

Tesla Submits FSD Supervised Application to Taiwan's Vehicle Safety Certification Center

Tesla has officially submitted its FSD Supervised application to Taiwan's Vehicle Safety Certification Center (VSCC). The application has entered the formal examination process.